![]() Is this prediction of Einstein's relativity natural or idiotic? If it is idiotic, we have reductio ad absurdum - the underlying premise, Einstein's constant-speed-of-light postulate, is false.įirst of all, the Universe, most fundamentally is a Binary System, with Matter and Space, or Energy and Dark Energy (Dark Energy could be considered Space, or Space-Time/Aether, Zero Point Energy etc) - we are not in 5 dimensions, we are in a 10 Dimension "Bubble" that is part of the Multiverse, and there is an 11th Dimension, but within the 10 Dimension "Universe" we are in, we ARE IN FACT within the 5th Dimension within the 10 Dimensional Universe, which is within the 11th Dimension. If it does not explode under the strain and it is sufficiently elastic it will come to rest and start to spring back to its natural shape but since it is too big for the barn the other end is now going to crash into the back door and the rod will be trapped in a compressed state inside the barn." At that instant, you close both doors simultaneously, with your switch. So, as the pole passes through the barn, there is an instant when it is completely within the barn. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in the barn. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a switch. There was a divine creature - Albert Einstein - who said that the speed of light relative to any observer should be c - otherwise Divine Albert's Divine Theory would have to be abandoned, Divine Albert worshipers would lose their jobs, no more billions would be wasted and the world would end.Īccording to Einstein's relativity, unlimitedly long objects can gloriously be trapped inside unlimitedly short containers: We do have an explanation and it is supernatural. c, no matter how silly and even idiotic this sounds! ![]() The frequency the moving observer measures remains f'=c'/λ=(c+v)/λ but the speed of the waves relative to him should not be c'=c+v - it should be. ![]() The relation between c' and f' is quite natural and it is valid for all waves. Then the observer starts moving with speed v (v << c) towards the source - the speed of the waves relative to him becomes c'=c+v and the frequency he measures is now f'=c'/λ=(c+v)/λ. The observer is at rest with respect to the wave source - the waves have speed c relative to him and the frequency he measures is f=c/λ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |